Super Size Me Analysis Essay Example for Free

Super Size Me Analysis EssayTo some, eating solely get rid of the McDonalds plug-in for thirty days to converge what the effects may be is looked d testify at as an attack on unhealthy and fast food corporations, notwithstanding to many a(prenominal), Super Size Me is an flimsy documentary that helps shine a light on the horrendous effects that fast food has on our society. Morgan Spurlocks rules are unbiased only food off of McDonalds menu may be eaten, he must consume three meals a day, if asked to super size he must, and everything on the menu must be eaten at least once. On day one he goes and gets baseline measurements of his eubstance from numerous health and medical experts to be suitable to gauge himself as the month progresses, and from there on out, its chow time. Morgan Spurlocks Super Size Me digs beyond the obvious correlation amid fast food and poor health. Spurlock exposes the flaws in our societys prime(prenominal) of food, ramp ups the point that ad hominem right is essential, and openly criticizes corporate and government deniability.By using an super personal setting, a plethora of haunting visuals, interesting dialogues, a steady change in tone, and incorporation of children, Spurlock effectively delivers his message that fast food is a fast way to deteriorate your state of health. Morgan Spurlock, un comparable many other documentary producers, creates an extremely personal point of view. He does so by allowing the looker to see over his own shoulder, and not a random test subject, to watch his month long McDonalds binge.Spurlock immediately, and at times humorously, opens up completely to the audience. Before the viewer acknowledges it, Spurlock is half naked at the doctors, throwing up on camera, and organism torn apart by his wife about his in ability to perform in the bed. By having this more personal and open point of view, Spurlock is able to earn more of the audiences curse making it easier for him to get his message across. Second to the personal setting, the visual effects utilized by Spurlock make the message of the documentary hard to forget.Without fail, every two to five minutes a McDonalds prospering Arches appear somewhere on the screen, making it hard for the audience not to pair a electronegative denotation with it by the end of the film. Aside from all of the McDonalds signs, the camera consistently zooms in, as rigorous as one would ever want to be, to Spurlocks super sized french fries and spare greasy Big Mac. Watching the repetitiveness of close ups on processed, fried, and poorly do food is abundant for any viewer to not want to east fast food for quite sometime.Spurlock in addition uses simple charts, such as the ones to display his portrait as days pass, to allow the viewer to easily see the trend of negative health increasing directly with the amount of time spent on his McDonalds diet. Another interesting visual Spurlock uses is the satanic drawings of what appe ars to be Ronald McDonald. The pictures are demonic and are supposed to guide Ronald as a ruthless clown and not someone a little kid would like to be around. And if all of these visuals werent enough, Spurlock goes even up further when he shows a common body lean tearinguction surgery in action.The viewer first sees probes with cameras and tools inserted into the patients repulsively large belly, and and so ends up inside the patients fat filled stomach watching the surgeons nip and accumulate away. Spurlock makes it very hard for the viewer to forget what his message is with all of these images that stick in the back of your mind. From the guide on of McDonalds to a middle school kid buying lunch, Spurlock carries out an assortment of dialogues throughout the documentary. Although many are significant, the most memorable and effective would have to be the conversations Spurlock has while visiting Madison third-year High School.He first confronts a girl with only cookies and french fries on her central office and asks her if shes going to eat anything else. The girl simply says no. Spurlock moves on to the lunch line and asks a girl if she was going to get anything else other than french fries on her plate and she responds, Well Im getting milk its my calcium and my vegetables. If you werent disgusted with the kids food choices alone, Spurlock moves on to the lunch ladies to get their two cents on the food being served at their school.The lunch ladies were content with the byword ignorance is bliss. They serve the kids french fries, swiss rolls, and high sugar drinks, assuming that they had brought their own sandwich from home, but none of them ever checked to see. They all claim that they are setting up the kids to make the right choices heretofore most of the kids arent. All of these dialogues Spurlock has at the Junior High School in Illinois were very eye opening, and do the viewer feel obligated to see more of what is going on behind the scen es at their own local schools.Further on in the film, Spurlock calls McDonaldsHeadquarters trying to set up an troth with someone high up in the corporation. Nearly every phone call he made he is promised either a message be delivered, a re scrap phone call, or a good time to call back. Following close to twenty phone calls later, Spurlock gives up trying to roll an appointment with the head of McDonalds. After seeing Spurlock get shot down time and time again, it makes the viewer wonder if McDonalds is trying to dodge a question that could damage their reputation, as well as contemplate how unprofessional their business is run.Another key strategy Spurlock uses throughout his month long McDonalds stint is the gradual change in tone. From the beginning, Spurlock is very excited to kick off his McDonalds scoopful diet and has a cheerful tone and positive attitude. After a couple of days turn into a couple of weeks, Spurlocks tone changes drastically. Instead of optimistic and cheer y, like from the beginning of the month, Spurlock now has a rather negative and dire one. Phone calls between him and his girlfriend that once were normal, turn in to him severely questioning his will to continue with his experiment.Spurlocks tone and attitude are easily noted as having a negative correlation with days spent on the McDonalds diet. By showing this trend, Spurlock is able to emphasize the emotional, rather than just the sensual, effects of his diet to the viewers. Throughout the documentary, Spurlock continuously incorporates children to capture the viewers attention and to show that the obesity problems start at a young age. A Pizza Hut, a Pizza Hut, Kentucky Fried Chicken, and a Pizza Hut. McDonalds, McDonalds, Kentucky Fried Chicken, and a Pizza Hut is sang by young children, some being obese, right at the start of the film.If this doesnt raise a red flag in ones head that children are being taught how to sing Americas most unhealthy fast food restaurants in scho ol, Im not sure what will. Spurlock also spends a decent portion of his documentary in schools. He examines the food choices available to the kids, asks them about what they eat, and observes their physical education class. The most effective use of incorporating children is the interviews he conducts by holding up pictures of noted Americans and famous fast food icons, then asking the children who they are and what they were.Some of the children could identify George Washington and what he did, but as soon as Spurlock showed them a picture of Jesus all were stumped, one boy even guessed he was George W. Bush. Then the pictures of Wendy and Ronald McDonald were shown, and to no surprise every kid there knew exactly who Ronald was and that he is associated with McDonalds. By putting this emphasis on young children being led down the wrong path at an early age, makes the viewers compelled to believe that our society is going wrong with teaching healthy food choices.Whether it was the personal touch, visuals, dialogues, change in tone, real footage, or incorporation of children, Morgan Spurlock does an impeccable job provoking Americans to question their choice in food and influencing them to take action. When the final results of Spurlocks experiment are posted (13% weight increase, cholesterin level of 230, and dysfunctional liver) its going to be very hard for me to walk into a McDonalds. So, adjacent time Im faced with the choice of eating at fast food or taking a little time of my day to cook myself a meal, I definitely know which one Ill be doing, but the real question is will everyone else?